Article 821 of comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer: | |
Path: | icdoc!zmact61 |
>From: | zmact61@doc.ic.ac.uk (D Spinellis) |
Newsgroups: | alt.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer |
Subject: | Re: .RTLINK |
Message-ID: | <1830@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> |
Date: | 27 Apr 90 18:07:42 GMT |
References: | <1020@s3.ireq.hydro.qc.ca> |
Sender: | news@doc.ic.ac.uk |
Reply-To: | dds@cc.ic.ac.uk (Diomidis Spinellis) |
Organization: | Imperial College Department of Computing |
Lines: | 23 |
Content-Length: | 1303 |
In article <1020@s3.ireq.hydro.qc.ca> robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca () writes: > > I read a few ad's in magazine about a product called .RTLINK >This product is supposed to be a lot better then MS-LINK and TLINK. >I intend to use that product with QuickBasic 4.5. Anyone on the >net have ever heard of that product and know if it works with >QuickBasic? A company I do consulting for, bought .RRTLINK+. It has free form syntax, better than the one used by MS-LINK. It allows you to have more than one overlay area and you can also have external dynamically linked libraries, thus saving space if you are distributing a number of executables using the same libraries. Problem is it crashed on big QuickBasic 6.0 programs. It linked my own C code, but when that grew big it started complaining and producing executables that would crash. It is supposed to support Quick Basic and from the manual they seem to have a very good support scheme (no great use from Europe thought). Diomidis -- Diomidis Spinellis Internet: dds@cc.ic.ac.uk Department of Computing UUCP: ...!ukc!iccc!dds Imperial College JANET: dds@uk.ac.ic.cc London SW7 2BZ #include "/dev/tty"